cuil.com search ranking
Monday, July 28th, 2008I was intrigued to read about a new search engine, cuil.com, which is being launched by former Google employees. So I tried it out by searching for XULRunner. The top hits were:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XULRunner
- http://wiki.mozilla.org/XULRunner:Roadmap
- http://blogs.acceleration.net/ryan/archive/2005/05/06/1073.aspx
- http://chatzilla.rdmsoft.com/xulrunner/
- http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner
- http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2008/02/flickr-uploadr-open-source-xulrunner.html
- http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2007-05-15/xulrunner-what-we-are-doing/
- http://www.songbirdnest.com/node/1771
There were also suggested “categories”:
- Mozilla
- Mozilla Foundation, SpiderMonkey, MozillaZine, Mitchell Baker, SeaMonkey, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Public License, Bugzilla
- Mozilla Developers
- Asa Dotzler, Mitchell Baker, Daniel Glazman, Window Snyder, Brendan Eich, Mike Shaver, Ben Goodger, Tristan Nitot
- Mozilla Extensions
- ChatZilla, Adblock, Greasemonkey, CustomizeGoogle, DOM Inspector, Venkman, Flashblock, ColorZilla
- Netscape
- Mozilla, Netscape Navigator, Netscape Browser, The Book of Mozilla, Daniel Glazman, Ben Goodger, Netscape Communicator, Tristan Nitot
- W3C Standards
- MathML, Resource Description Framework, XSL Transformations, Document Object Model, Cascading Style Sheets, Scalable Vector Graphics, XHTML, … (hidden)
I’m a bit disturbed by the pattern here: a search for XULRunner turns up interesting results, but the primary page on XULRunner (http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner) is not present. Suggested terms for Mozilla has interesting results, but the most important (Firefox) is not present. The suggested categories are interesting, but the sub-results aren’t relevant to the specific topic I searched for: what I really want is “Mozilla Developers who do XULRunner”.
Is cuil.com built on a strategy of “list all the search results except for the one I really wanted”?
Oh, and a search for “tamarin javascript” turns up 0 results… something must be fishy with their search index.